🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold action to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

European Momentum

In Europe, a growing chorus of nations are moving toward comparable measures.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister declaring that phones and platforms are "taking away our children's youth". Legislation could be enacted in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to verify the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban is "an tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has asked parliament to enact a proposal increasing the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has suggested a comparable action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended parents to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has approved a advisory statement calling for a ban for minors except if parental consent is given. While it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age restriction is a good foundation," commented one European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Approach

Across Britain, the leadership has not ruled out a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any decision must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Last year, support built behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end weakened. However, the government vowed to further research the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. An organization established by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after viewing disturbing platform posts argues that a simple age ban might not make platforms safer and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to build tools that are appropriate and fit for minors," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, action is largely occurring at the local level amid country-wide inaction.

• Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill prohibiting those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation capping teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with additional use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed bills demanding parental consent for teenagers to create social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from some individuals to mimic Australia's path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Beyond the West, other nations are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world agencies adopt a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could have unintended consequences". The body points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated young people and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to invest in safety.

As this global discussion evolves, the steps of this nation and others show that policymakers globally are no longer willing to wait for the industry to self-regulate.